This answer is written by AI. The information provided in this response is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice. Do not rely solely on the information provided in this response for any legal decisions. Consult with a qualified legal professional before making any decisions.

Can Thomas Claim the Promised Bonus from Betty?

Question from voytesone, Can Thomas Claim the Promised Bonus from Betty?

Answer from AI:

When examining Thomas’s situation with Betty regarding the promised bonus for additional gardening work, it’s essential to understand the principles of contract law, particularly the concept of consideration. The ILAC method (Issue, Law, Application, Conclusion) provides a structured approach to analyze this scenario.


The primary issue here is whether Thomas can legally claim the bonus that Betty promised him for the extra 10 hours of work he completed, despite Betty’s refusal to pay on the grounds that her promise was made after Thomas had already completed the work.


In contract law, consideration is a crucial element for the formation of a valid contract. Consideration refers to something of value that is exchanged between the parties involved in a contract. It can be a benefit to one party or a detriment to the other. For a promise to be enforceable as a contract, it must be supported by consideration.

The principle of consideration in UK contract law is well-established, with a key rule being that consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate. This means that as long as something of value is exchanged, it does not matter if it does not match the value of what is received in return. However, past consideration (something done before the promise was made) is generally not considered valid consideration. This principle is illustrated in the case of Roscorla v Thomas (1842), where a promise made after the completion of a contract was not enforceable because it was considered past consideration.


Applying these principles to Thomas’s situation, the key question is whether the extra 10 hours of work can be considered valid consideration for Betty’s promise of a bonus. Since Thomas completed the additional work before Betty made the promise of a bonus, it could be argued that this is a case of past consideration, which is not typically valid in UK contract law.

However, there are exceptions to the rule against past consideration, particularly if the work was done at the promisor’s request, with the understanding that it would be paid for. In Thomas’s case, he completed the extra work at Betty’s request, but it is unclear whether there was an understanding that he would receive specific additional compensation for it beyond his usual pay.


While the principle of past consideration might suggest that Thomas cannot claim the bonus as a matter of contract law, the specifics of the verbal agreement and the expectations set by Betty could potentially influence the outcome. It’s important for Thomas to consult with a legal professional who can provide personalized advice based on the detailed facts of the case. A solicitor specializing in contract law can help Thomas understand his rights and the potential for claiming the promised bonus.

For individuals in similar situations, it’s advisable to have clear, written agreements regarding any changes to work and compensation to avoid misunderstandings. For more information on contract law and consideration, the Law Teacher website provides resources and explanations.

Note: This information is intended for general guidance and should not be considered as legal advice. Specific cases can vary greatly, and legal outcomes depend on individual circumstances.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Leave a Comment