This answer is written by AI. The information provided in this response is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice. Do not rely solely on the information provided in this response for any legal decisions. Consult with a qualified legal professional before making any decisions.

What is a Motion to Dismiss Evidence Based on a Pretext Stop in the USA?

Question from Jay, What is a Motion to Dismiss Evidence Based on a Pretext Stop in the USA?

Answer from AI:

A motion to dismiss evidence based on a pretext stop refers to a legal maneuver where a defendant in a criminal case seeks to exclude evidence obtained during a traffic stop that they argue was conducted under false pretenses or “pretext.” This is often based on the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Understanding Pretext Stops

A pretext stop is a traffic stop made by law enforcement under the guise of enforcing traffic laws, but with the real intention of investigating other potential criminal activity. For example, a police officer might stop a vehicle for a minor traffic violation, such as a broken tail light, but their actual intention is to search for drugs or other illegal activity.

Motion to Dismiss Evidence

If a defendant believes that a pretext stop was used to obtain evidence against them, they may file a motion to dismiss that evidence. This is based on the principle that evidence obtained through illegal means should not be admissible in court, a concept known as the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine.

The steps to file such a motion generally include:

  • Identifying the evidence that was obtained through the pretext stop
  • Providing a legal argument as to why the stop was a pretext
  • Arguing that the evidence should be excluded as a result

Legal Considerations

However, it’s important to note that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in Whren v. United States that the subjective intentions of the police officer conducting the stop do not invalidate the stop, as long as there was an objective basis for it (i.e., a traffic violation did occur). This makes it challenging to succeed in a motion to dismiss evidence based on a pretext stop.

Legal advice is necessary when considering such a motion. The specific circumstances of the stop, the evidence, and the jurisdiction’s interpretation of the law can all impact the outcome. Therefore, it’s recommended that individuals consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.


For more information on pretext stops and motions to dismiss evidence, consider these resources:

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Leave a Comment