This answer is written by AI. The information provided in this response is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice. Do not rely solely on the information provided in this response for any legal decisions. Consult with a qualified legal professional before making any decisions.

Why Might a Right to Store Not Qualify as an Easement?

Question from v, Why Might a Right to Store Not Qualify as an Easement?

Answer from AI:

When discussing the nature of easements and property rights, it’s important to understand the criteria that define an easement. An easement is a right by one landowner over the land of another for a specific purpose. In the scenario provided, the tenant’s right to use the landowner’s garden shed for bike storage raises questions about whether this right can be considered an easement under UK law.

Understanding Easements

Easements are a type of property right that allows the holder of the easement (the dominant estate) to use the property of another (the servient estate) in a particular way. For an easement to be legally recognized, it must meet several criteria:

  1. There must be a dominant and a servient tenement: This means there must be two separate pieces of land involved, one benefiting from the easement and the other burdened by it.
  2. The easement must accommodate the dominant tenement: The right must benefit the land, not just the individual owner or occupier of the land.
  3. There must be different owners of the two tenements: This is known as diversity of ownership.
  4. The right must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant: This means the right must be clear and specific enough to be granted formally.

Analysis of the Scenario

Given the scenario, the statement that best explains why the right to store bikes in the shed is not capable of being an easement is:

The right is not capable of being an easement because the servient land owner is not left with any reasonable use of the shed.

This situation touches on the principle that for a right to qualify as an easement, it must not deprive the servient landowner of all reasonable use of their property. When the tenant secures the shed with a padlock, effectively excluding the landowner from using the shed, the right exceeds what is typically allowable in an easement. Easements are intended to grant rights that are compatible with the landowner’s continued use and enjoyment of their property.

Key Points to Consider

  • Easements should not grant exclusive possession or use of the servient tenement to the holder of the easement, as this would more closely resemble a lease or a license than an easement.
  • The right in question does not leave the landowner with any reasonable use of the shed, which is a critical factor in determining the validity of an easement.
  • While the scenario does not directly address the issue of diversity of ownership or whether the right touches and concerns the dominant land, these are also important considerations in determining whether a right can be an easement.


In conclusion, the right to store bikes in the shed, under the conditions described, does not meet the criteria for an easement primarily because it deprives the landowner of any reasonable use of their property. It’s important for both landowners and tenants to understand the nature of their rights and obligations under property law. For specific legal advice or to address complex property rights issues, consulting with a legal professional is recommended.

For more information on easements and property rights, you may find resources like the UK Land Registry helpful.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Leave a Comment